Introduction to critical thinking in finance

INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING IN FINANCE

Course Purpose & Objectives

The goal of this course is to equip students with critical thinking skills in finance, particularly in financial theory models and risk modelling. The course schedule will provide students with cognitive techniques and critical thinking tools to improve understanding of financial models that have a large societal and environmental impact. Upon completion of this course, students will have developed higher level thinking processes that will enable them to better address the issues facing the ecological transition of finance, make better decisions in model choices, and make better qualitative creative recommendations to business and industry stakeholders.

The methodology used is based on the addressing of financial problems by sociology and philosophy of science. Students taking this class will gain an in-depth understanding of philosophical notions that bear relevance to financial risk modelling. With support from sociology and philosophy of science, they will develop an independent mindset that enables them to better add value to data, interpret trends in financial modelling, understand the interaction between models and people, and take a broader financial perspective to drive the business.

More precisely, after completing the course, students are expected to be able to:

  • Explain the main characteristics of the Brownian representation and its impact to environmental issues.
  • Use critical thinking skills to identify epistemological issues in all financial modelling fields such as the problem of assumption corroboration that plagues all financial theories.
  • Start thinking critically about how financial knowledge is produced and accumulated, and how it might be contributed to in the future from a sustainable and ecological perspective.
  • Analyse how the different dynamics of knowledge success or fail to explain the persistence of a conceptual framework despite its drawbacks, and understand how to prepare a future conceptual framework for the purpose of the SDGs.

This module is composed by a combination of frontal lectures and group presentations.

Course description

The course will start with the example of the 2008 financial crisis to introduce students to the notion of epistemic ethics. We will describe the two ways in which mathematical theories of risk become the actual reality of professional practices: through speech acts and through management devices. Then we will study how the risk culture leads to a particular decision, by showing through the history of science how a risk culture is shaped by mathematical finance. This will allow us to introduce two risk cultures in finance, Brownian finance and non-Brownian finance. The history of the Brownian representation in finance will allow us to raise the puzzle of its maintenance despite its permanent invalidation by statistical tests. The course will then provide an introduction to Mandelbrot’s fractal geometry, with the aim of sketching out what a mathematical fractal finance (everywhere discontinuous) could be. The course will conclude with reflections on how to reconcile finance and nature in order to align finance with the SDGs.

Keywords

Critical thinking, fractal modelling methods, sustainable finance, performativity, risk modelling, SDGs.

 

COURSE CONTENTS AND TIMETABLE

Part I: ECTS Course (15h)

 

  1. Post-positivistic ethical perspectives for critical thinking in finance (3h)

 Content: Revisiting the 2008 financial crisis: “the formula that killed Wall Street”

  • Analysis of the movie Margin Call (2011): the discussion between the risk manager and the chairman
  • Inside the black box of the Li’s formula: debates and clues
  • Sustainable finance and epistemic ethics: the “ethical triangle”

De Bruin, Boudewijn. 2015. Ethics and the global financial crisis: why incompetence is worse than greed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cassidy, Rebecca. 2009. ‘Casino capitalism’ and the financial crisis”. Anthropology Today, 25(4): 10-13.

Embrechts, Paul. 2009. “Did a Mathematical Formula Really Blow up Wall Street?” https://www.actuaries.org/ASTIN/Colloquia/Helsinki/Presentations/Embrechts.pdf

MacKenzie, Donald; Spears, T.C. 2014. “The formula that killed Wall Street’: The Gaussian copula and modelling practices in investment banking”. Soc. Stud. Sci., 44: 393-417.

Salmon, Felix. 2009. “The Formula that Killed Wall Street”. Wired: San Francisco, CA, USA.

  1. The performativity of financial risk modelling: neoclassical finance at work (part I: 3h)

Content: Using philosophy to understand the financialisation of “real” economy by mathematical risk modelling

  • Financialised risk theories as speech acts: the financial “Logos

Austin, James L. 1955. How to do Things with Words. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.

Brisset, N. 2018. “Models as speech acts: The telling case of financial models”. J. Econ. Methodol. 25: 21-41

Walter, Christian. 2016. “The financial Logos: The framing of financial decision-making by mathematical modelling”, Research in International Business and Finance, 37: 597-604.

  1. The performativity of financial risk modelling: neoclassical finance at work (part II: 3h)

 Content: Using sociology to understand the financialisation of “real” economy by mathematical risk modelling

  • Financialised tools: the socio-technical instruments of financial practices
  • The quantification conventions

Callon, Michel. 1998. “The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics”. In The Laws of the Markets. Blackwell. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1-57.

Chiapello, Eve. 2020. “Financialization as a socio-technical process”. In The Routledge International Handbook of Financialization. Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA, pp. 81-91.

Chiapello, Eve and Walter, Christian. 2016. “The three ages of financial quantification: A conventionalist approach to the financier’s metrology”. Hist. Soc. Res. 41: 155-177.

Desrosières, A. 2008. Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification. Presses de l’Ecole des Mines: Paris.

MacKenzie, Donald. 2006. An Engine Not a Camera. How Financial Models Shape Markets. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

MacKenzie, D; Muniesa, F.; Siu, L. 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA.

Muniesa F. 2015. The Provoked Economy. Economic Reality and the Performative Turn; Routledge: Abingdon, UK.

Svetlova, E. 2018. Financial Models and Society. Villains or Scapegoats. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK.

  1. Philosophy of science and risk culture in finance (part I: 3h)

Content: Using history of science to flush out the assumptions of unsustainable neoclassical finance

  • Mental models in finance: the principle of continuity and the theory of average

Walter, Christian. 2013. Le modèle de marche au hasard en finance. Ch. 4

  1. Philosophy of science and risk culture in finance (part II: 3h)

Content: The risk culture of finance

  • Two risk cultures: unsustainable and sustainable (smooth/rough and short term/long term)
  • “Brown finance” and “green finance”

Jorion, Philippe. 2007. Value-at-Risk. The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. 3rd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.

Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

Mantzavinos, C. 2001. Individuals, Institutions, and Markets. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search